|
谢谢各位老大 我2012年时在P30/Px4中选择,当时在被雷打和西格任职过的某位回复我说
“If given a choice between a PX4 and a case of herpes, I'd probably flip a coin...
The Cougar, which also had a rotating barrel, had various problems not all of which were related to the locking system. That gun eventually reached a point where they didn't want their name on it any more and it's now marketed under their cheaper Stoeger brand.
Many of the same problems were carried through to the PX4, but the locking mechanism was "fixed" just enough to make it extremely sensitive to cleaning and lubrication. As mentioned earlier by will_1400, I once had a group of students from a government agency show up to class with their PX4 and literallyuse a mallet to smash the guns open when they got too dirty to manipulate by hand. One of the guys in the group had the mallet in his range kit for exactly that purpose.
Like anything else, I have no doubt that someone somewhere has a PX4 that is awesome, runs like a sewing machine built by God Himself, and is capable of shooting around corners. But in my experience the PX4 as a species is inferior to many competing products on the market.
No, the guns were not run dry. The reality is that the system doesn't lend itself well to any kind of high volume shooting without being cleaned.
I'd throw the question back and ask it this way: What would make you choose the PX4 over a more proven, more popular gun?
|
|