州里通过的法律，联邦法官说不行，这法律还有效？

ken2sf

纽约通过NY Safe Act，说可以有10发的弹夹，但是只能装7发子弹。最高法院联邦法官说这违反宪法。

wikipedia http://en.wikipedia....w_York_Safe_Act
On December 31, 2013, Chief U.S. District Judge William M. Skretny, of the Federal District Court in Buffalo, upheld most of the New York SAFE Act, saying that its provisions "further the state's important interest in public safety.... it does not totally disarm New York's citizens; and it does not meaningfully jeopardize their right to self-defense".[10] However he struck down the provision that only seven rounds of ammunition could be loaded into a ten-round magazine, calling it "an arbitrary restriction" that violated the Second Amendment, and saying that it could result in "pitting the criminal with a fully-loaded magazine against the law-abiding citizen limited to seven rounds."[10]

那这法律是已经废除了，还是需要时间州里改了才算？我在老美网站问，有人说，保险起见，还是只装7发子弹。纯粹法律意义上，是这样的吗？大家普及一下这法律知识。。。

joyjoy

政客的智商无下限啊。同病相怜的加州苦命人。

firexl

我觉得这个法官的分量不够
美国的联邦法院分三等
一个supereme court
11个court of appeals
94个district court
这个法官只是供职于最低的district court，影响力有限

doublepar

这法官的辖区还不涵盖整个纽约州，所以理论上这个七发子弹的条款在纽约部份地区还有效。这案子不会停在这里，一定会往上走。

helloterran

在州里修改法律之前还真有效

比如ATF 2011年发公开信说对非公民买枪要求3个月连续居留证明违反了自己的政策，“即将修改”这个条例。

结果现在也没有正式发公文修改。我去的那家FFL 100%遵纪守法，每次都要我出示utility bill。