这个case本身没什么大不了的，NYSR&PA is about the NYC law that prohibit individuals who have a license to own a firearm from transporting them to/from shooting ranges or hunting outside of the city. Case doesn’t have anything to do with commercial regulation or FFL’s.
这事件的意义在于，SC终于take a 2A case了。看文章的评论，这个要等到今年秋天才处理。有得等呢。
最早的应该是 US v. Cruikshank。虽然这个案子的结论带有时代的局限性，但其判词还是很有力的。
"The right to bear arms is not granted by the Constitution; neither is it in any manner dependent upon that instrument for its existence. The Second Amendment means no more than that it shall not be infringed by Congress, and has no other effect than to restrict the powers of the National Government."
[复制链接]
发表于 2019-1-22 07:40
提升卡
变色卡
千斤顶
楼主
