|
|
楼主 |
发表于 2015-12-28 20:52
|
显示全部楼层
House Journal. Representive PHILLIPS & Representive DUTTON
http://www.journals.house.state. ... 3FINAL.PDF#page=317
PHILLIPS: Let me back up. If they have stopped them for a lawful reason—
DUTTON: Yes, I should have said that. I should have laid the predicate for it. Myquestion has to do with—I m just standing on the corner, and I ’ m wearing a ’weapon openly, and the police drive up. I m not doing anything else. Does a ’person have to respond to an inquiry by the police as to whether or not they havea license?
PHILLIPS: I don t believe so, if they don ’ t have a legitimate reason to stop them. ’What I would say is that most of us that would be carrying would gladly respondyes. But the question is, if the sole reason is just to come ask me that, no. Ifthey ve stopped me for a traffic offense, if they ’ ve stopped me, they certainly ’have a right to. The law is very clear. If you re lawfully stopped, you have to ’show it. Very clear.
DUTTON: And that s why that amendment was so important because the ’amendment only related to the word solely. They couldn t abridge a citizen ’ s’rights solely because they were engaging in carrying—because when this billpasses, it will be a lawful activity that they will be engaging in, correct?
PHILLIPS: That is correct. Mr. Dutton, all the scenarios we kept hearingabout—well, what about this scenario, what about—as long as you realize thatsolely is in there, all of those, they had a legitimate reason, and you had to show itto them.
=====
如果是我open carry的时候，真问到我，为了尽快脱身和不惹麻烦我估计也会给他们看ID。但这并不代表他们是对的。
具体愿不愿意掏ID，看各人自己吧。
|
|
发表于 2015-12-28 17:22
提升卡
变色卡
千斤顶
发表于 2015-12-28 17:33
