自卫值班枪别乱改动

CiTY_HuNTeR

alex 发表于 2016-3-16 12:52
就是好奇问问，"making a gun more deadly"违反了哪条法律？

重点不是make it more deadly（you cannot make a gun more deadly without changing its caliber anyway），而是negligence

CiTY_HuNTeR

QuiMi 发表于 2016-3-16 14:03
"Make it more deadly" looks bad on its own right too.

When you are in court, you don't want to be ...

所以就看律师吵架功夫了。我不是律师，但至少知道这个论点有两点漏洞：1。more deadly如果同样的管长缠距，同样的口径，打出去同样的子弹物理上说动能不应该相差太多，在加工精度的variance以内。所以这点不成立。2。would have not died是个伪命题，首先自卫者并没有杀人意图，只是stop threat。至于不幸挂掉的thug，只能说so sad。至于他会不会死，这点无法假设，除非他能找一个人让被告用没改过的枪再打一遍。到这时候就像原文说的，事实不那么重要，要看律师能力

CiTY_HuNTeR

QuiMi 发表于 2016-3-16 14:43
You are correct in theory but theories do not matter in court.  A lawyer just need to convince s ...

I use factory trigger on all my ccw guns. And IF you read what I wrote before, I wasn't trying to disagree with the original post AT ALL...
I wasn't going to "Take that chance", I was just saying proof and physics on the course doesn't mean bs, unless you have a good lawyer to explain them.

CiTY_HuNTeR

alex 发表于 2016-3-16 15:37
不make sense。

因为你还有节操和底线。等你当了律师或者记者就make sense了

CiTY_HuNTeR

alex 发表于 2016-3-16 15:41
那就看律师怎么咬俺的factory setting的lem版的屁三菱死磕加safety吧。more deadly?no... less deadly。l ...

之前看到有g的ghost connector和wolff弹簧套件一起卖，不过查了一下原厂和卖家说法都是弹簧是“not for duty or ccw，for competition and target shooting only”，估计就是要免除法律责任

CiTY_HuNTeR

HRQYH 发表于 2016-3-16 21:03
好像入室搶劫的，威脅他人生命安全的，都是大爺。自衛的都跟三孫子是的。所以，不到萬不得已的程度，別開槍 ...

跟警察关系不大，应该是检察官和陪审团是否友好。

各地方区别明显，在南方州只要你明显是自卫不是胡乱开枪，连起诉都不会有。芝麻人事件本来也是地方不起诉，但是被8马的幕僚发掘出来炒作起诉，结果依然是无罪，不过他们的政治目的已经达到了。