Brace, stabilizing brace ...

X-PGH

BREAKING NEWS: ATF Coming After Firearms with Stabilizing Braces

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JKqKPNGH4r8

Jet

狼，真的来了？

ilpanther88

现在真是无语了

好好的新闻，文字几十秒抓要点一两分钟能看完，非哔哔赖赖录视频，读者浪费时间作者也浪费时间。

中国和美国的互联网表达水平都在倒退。

FJC

直接贴个link吧，省得看了

https://www.atf.gov/rules-and-re ... -stabilizing-braces

Colt1911

来个摘要吧

CiTY_HuNTeR

FJC 发表于 2021-6-7 15:19
直接贴个link吧，省得看了

https://www.atf.gov/rules-and-regulations/factoring-criteria-firearms-atta ...

The proposed rule would:

• Amend the definition of “rifle” in 27 CFR 478.11 and 479.11, respectively, by adding a sentence at the end of each definition to clarify that the term “rifle” includes any weapon with a rifled barrel and equipped with an attached “stabilizing brace” that has objective design features and characteristics that indicate that the firearm is designed to be fired from the shoulder.
• Set forth a worksheet “Factoring Criteria for Rifled Barrel Weapons with Accessories commonly referred to as ‘Stabilizing Braces,’” ATF Worksheet 4999, to aid the firearms industry and public in understanding the criteria that ATF considers when evaluating firearm samples that are submitted with an attached “stabilizing brace” or similar component or accessory.
  

This proposed rule would not affect “stabilizing braces” that are objectively designed and intended as a “stabilizing brace” for use by individuals with disabilities, and not for shouldering the weapon as a rifle. Such stabilizing braces are designed to conform to the arm and not as a buttstock.

阿鲁卡多

CiTY_HuNTeR 发表于 2021-6-7 12:34
The proposed rule would:

Amend the definition of “rifle” in 27 CFR 478.11 and 479.11, respec ...

所以看起来ATF要把所有装了brace的pistol都定义为rifle了，这个是妥妥的要禁掉ar pistol的感觉

idee

阿鲁卡多 发表于 2021-6-7 12:54
所以看起来ATF要把所有装了brace的pistol都定义为rifle了，这个是妥妥的要禁掉ar pistol的感觉
...

靠"features"评分，看样子popular braces里面幸存者不多

fisherman188

ATF这个规定应该会被人告吧？

X-PGH

这篇报道看得比较明了：

https://www.ammoland.com/2021/06 ... ules/#axzz6x9HLmrSR

HammerHeart

Ammoland说的不对吧，13.5inch指的是LOP。 我没看到ATF pdf里面有说shotgun

ATF的pdf最后有例子，其实人家都给你想好出路了，照那样子做就合规
看起来SBL-mini要大卖，KAK blade那种要加个strap

另外看起来Other要黄

firexl

HammerHeart 发表于 2021-6-7 17:45
Ammoland说的不对吧，13.5inch指的是LOP。 我没看到ATF pdf里面有说shotgun

ATF的pdf最后有例子，其实人家 ...

权利就是这么一点一点被蚕食的。
别说brace，我觉得连sbr都不应该算nfa。

foureyes

以后可能要凭残趴购买持有brace

HammerHeart

firexl 发表于 2021-6-7 19:30
权利就是这么一点一点被蚕食的。
别说brace，我觉得连sbr都不应该算nfa。
...

这我同意啊，所以用了无奈的表情

zhangaa

foureyes 发表于 2021-6-8 05:30
以后可能要凭残趴购买持有brace

哈哈對呀他們的拐都有brace啊

foureyes

这个讲得还行啊
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0yEW7Y0JPxo

masterplan

实在不行换回tube吧。 请问规定里的6-6.5inch的tube怎么量的， 标准的长度包括thread超寸了啊。
另外会不会短了也不行

idee

看看Tailhook的幾個是否能過關

Huntington

现在枪的重量，枪的红点和铁瞄都参与到SBR的定义中了，这个不是荒谬不知道什么是荒谬？典型的拿了鸡毛（SBR）当令箭。

MrDJay

还没有结束public comment period对吧，是不是应该都去comment一下？至少尽力反应反对意见，输了也不可惜。我已经去comment。