最近在看的一些跟2A有关的法律/历史/评论

NCL

(1876) United States v. Cruikshank

• Wikipedia.org上的介绍
  

Pre- DC v. Heller

• Erwin Chemerinsky, Putting the Gun Control Debate in Social Perspective (pdf). 一个反枪人士2004年的文章。作者指出（当时）法律上有三个问题待解决：1. 2A是否适用于州；2. 什么样的scrutiny；3. 如何界定一项法规算不算“infringement of the right to bear arms”。
  

(2008) DC v. Heller

• 海勒判决：美国宪法第二修正案的涵义 by hci@qiangyou.org
• Slip opinion: text on qiangyou.org; pdf on supremecourt.gov
• 庭辩录音，非常非常值得一听。
• Discussion of the "felon" issue in DC v. Heller on Sentencing law and policy blog
• 控枪人士下一步的攻击点（最后一段）
  

(2010) McDonald v. Chicago

• Slip opinion: pdf on supremecourt.gov
  

Post- McDonald v. Chicago

• Tina Mehr & Adam Winkler, October 2010. The Standardless Second Amendment. Issue Brief by the American Constitution Society for Law and Policy (pdf). 作者说，McDonald v. Chicago之后，多数的地方控枪法规还是被判为不违宪，并探讨原因。
• Sentencing law and policy blog上对上文的讨论
• Bob Owens, January 2014. And The War on the Second Amendment Continues. 一个拥枪派对法官uphold Connecticut Assault Weapon Ban的评论。
  

History

• On Second Opinion Blog. 讨论2A相关历史问题一个blog。在2009年1月开始的一个系列（Root Causes of Never-Ending Second Amendment Dispute）中，作者讨论了DC v. Heller中由15名历史学家提交的支持DC政府的amicus brief中的错误。
  

brucewayne

http://thf_media.s3.amazonaws.com/2014/pdf/CGL16.pdf

再补充个这个

TFollowerII

再补充一个 The First Amendment Guide to the Second Amendment PDF

Conclusion

Much more can, and should, be written about the intersection of First and Second Amendment doctrines. This Article has attempted to advance scholarly and judicial analysis by examining various principles and doctrines that were originally developed for the First Amendment that may be useful for analyzing the Second Amendment. The Supreme Court’s decisions in Heller and McDonald show that for analysis of the Second Amendment, the First Amendment is in a preferred position. Lower courts such as the Seventh Circuit and the D.C. Circuit have followed the Supreme Court’s teaching in this regard, although the D.C. Circuit seems to have forgotten that Justice Breyer was writing for the Heller dissent, not the majority. Many First Amendment principles and doctrines have ready application to the Second Amendment. A few, such as prior restraint, require a more selective and nuanced approach.
For a few decades in the late twentieth  century, the Second Amendment was ignored or denigrated by some courts. Now that the Second Amendment has been restored to its rightful position as part of normal constitutional law, the Second  Amendment will, like many other provisions of the Constitution, continue to be influenced by the rich body of doctrines and precedents that were first developed for the First Amendment.