本帖最后由 uper 于 2022-5-13 09:30 编辑
7999$, 只能是富人的玩具了。
btw, 民间的批判精神还是挺值得称赞的 -
https://www.thedrive.com/the-war ... ys-new-squad-rifles
DavidFMayerPhD 6 May, 2022 The big issue here seems to be WEIGHT. When a person has to carry around a huge amount of stuff already, every gram counts in terms of fatigue。
Edward Randall 6 May, 2022
I believe the NGSW program is a waste of money. The rifle is no better than the FN SCAR or Designated Marksman rifle already in service. We could save a lot of money by using the composite case ammunition from true velocity in 7.62 and the current rifles. The suppressor on the NGSW is not needed. Rifle fire location systems such as the Boomerang use the shock wave from the projectile to locate the point of origin. The fire locator could still locate our troops with suppressors on the rifles unless the projectile is subsonic.
Ciprian Dinu 23 April, 2022 I'm not an expert, but it seems like this program fixes a lot of problems that never existed.
Andrew 22 April, 2022 The US military is making the same mistake they made back in 1954 when they adapted the full power 7.62mm round instead of the intermediate 7mm British round. The 6.8mm x 51 is a full power round by Sig Sauer that is designed to be on par with the 7.62mm x 51 NATO. The recoil on both are extremely harsh on an assault rifle platform. This is the exact reason why 5.56mm NATO replaced the 7.62mm NATO. Now they are making a complete circle back to the 7.62 mm, but in a different caliber. Why they did not opt to go with more sensible intermediate round like the 6.8mm SPC Remington or 6.5mm Grendel or the like is beyond me. Now we will see more waste of taxpayers money trying to fix their mistakes with another “new round” and weapon because the recoil this full power round is barely manageable.Rick Yerby 22 April, 2022This is what happens when the chair borne commandos in the pentagon make decisions. This weapon is heavier , the ammo is heavier , The chamber pressure is 80,000 pounds so it is going to slap you around. This is insane and will end up costing US troops their lives. There is no hope of developing fire superiority with this system.
|