|
看了这逼喷屎的文章
https://faculty.diversity.ucla.e ... uty-to-our-students
给丫气的。
Dear Dr. Gene D. Block,
I am so disappointed to your recent article "The Impact of Proposition 209 and Our Duty to Our Students".
Maybe you are not aware of your logic mistakes in your article, you claim the issues(children from certain race are biased, isolated by 209), let me help you out. Is there a quantitative assessment to admit students into college? Do students of certain race(jew/Asian) get any bonus points in this process?
No actually being Asians makes you more difficult to get admitted, with the same test credentials!
Then why do Asians get better academic profiles?
Do we always have rich parents? No! I am from low income families, and so many of my friends!
Do we get more private tutor? No!
The only difference, is, we spend more time and efforts to study, even my parents are not well educated, they would always emphasize on the importance of education, not like many other children from your favored race, who have father, but never see their father, or their parents don't sacrifice themselves to make sure their children focusing on studies.
We don't get what we get by any unfair competition, and you, you want to take away the fair judgement(well, not really fair even in current admission process), you propose to judge a student by his skin color!
I dare you do that to maintain your lab research! I dare you show me all the students/postdocs you advised! I dare you show on the same website you publish your "The Impact of Proposition 209 and Our Duty to Our Students" side by side a list of the names/pictures of all those work/graduated in your lab, and see if they satisfy your DREAM diversity!
I dare you more to show your proof that all the papers/patents from your lab have the statistical distribution of authors consistent with your favorite diversity!
Can you do that for me?
Thank you so much for not being hypocritical!
XXXX
|
评分
-
查看全部评分
|