枪友会

 找回密码
 立即注册
搜索
热搜: 入门 指南 攻略
查看: 2449|回复: 10

[狩猎武器] 有人用leupold vx-r hog镜子吗?

[复制链接]

90

主题

764

帖子

1万

积分

老牌枪友

Rank: 3Rank: 3

积分
18785
楼主
发表于 2014-11-27 10:06 | 显示全部楼层
本帖最后由 rc256 于 2014-11-27 12:08 编辑

I think vortex pst 1-4x24 is better. Particularly
1. Eye relief is 4" instead of 3.5 (vx-R)
2. Better reticle. Mil-mil. I think it is good enough for even 200yd precision
3. Better illuminated circle. 4. 1x instead of 1.25x much larger FOV.
5. I think this would be good for eventual African dangerous game as well.

A little more expensive.


image.jpg (94.89 KB, 下载次数: 28)

image.jpg

image.jpg (92.92 KB, 下载次数: 26)

image.jpg
Work hard, play harder
回复

使用道具 举报

90

主题

764

帖子

1万

积分

老牌枪友

Rank: 3Rank: 3

积分
18785
沙发
发表于 2014-11-27 10:56 来自手机 | 显示全部楼层
This particular model? My pst 2.5-10 is good for night vision. Illumination is extremely well graded.
回复

使用道具 举报

90

主题

764

帖子

1万

积分

老牌枪友

Rank: 3Rank: 3

积分
18785
板凳
发表于 2014-11-27 15:19 来自手机 | 显示全部楼层
本帖最后由 rc256 于 2014-11-27 17:24 编辑

http://m14forum.com/optics/125571-opinions-viper-pst-vs-leupold-vx-r-patrol.html

Hard to say. Some people complain vortex illuminated not bright enough. But I hunk that's a moot point since the reticle is etched and can still be seen during day light without being illuminated. So I don't think t is an issue when bright. I am more concerned if it is too bright in dark condition, which I have not seen complaints.

Another point some people bring up is the lense may have flare, which I don't have confirmed evidence.

I do have a concern that the reticle may seem a little too busy and may be distracting. But I do like the wider FOV and less power at 1x.

How about this, you get a vx-r and I get a pst. And we can compare and evaluate.
回复

使用道具 举报

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

本版积分规则

触屏版|枪友会

GMT-8, 2024-5-15 19:31 , Processed in 0.031159 second(s), 20 queries .

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表